MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2776202374 · doi:10.23919/eumic.2017.8230654

Self-heating and polarization effects in AlGaN/AlN/GaN/AlGaN based devices

2017· article· en· W2776202374 on OpenAlexaff
K. Ahmeda, Brendan Ubochi, K. Kálna, B. Benbakhti, S. J. Duffy, Weidong Zhang, A. Soltani

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGaN-based semiconductor devices and materials
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolarization (electrochemistry)InverseElectric fieldMaterials scienceHeterojunctionOptoelectronicsThermalGallium nitrideTopology (electrical circuits)PhysicsElectrical engineeringNanotechnologyChemistryPhysical chemistryThermodynamicsQuantum mechanicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The interplay of self-heating and polarization affecting the current is studied in Al0.32Ga0.68N/AlN/GaN/Al0.1Ga0.9N Transmission Line Model (TLM) heterostructures with a scaled source-drain distance. The study is based on meticulously calibrated TCAD simulations against I-V experimental characteristics using an electro-thermal model. The electro-thermal simulations show hot-spots at the edge of the drain contact due to a large electric field affecting the device reliability. Due to the applied electrical stress, the total polarization, relative to the 18 pm heterostructure, decreases by 7 %, 10 % and 17% during a reduction of the source-to-drain distance to the 12 pm, 8 pm, and 4 pm, respectively, as a result of the additional strain induced by electrical stress. This additional stress on source/drain contacts reduces the polarization at the surface as a result of the inverse piezoelectric effect.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGaN-based semiconductor devices and materialsFrench-language works237,207