MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2776236592 · doi:10.1166/jctn.2012.2070

Specific Heat Capacity of TiO<sub>2</sub> Nanoparticles

2012· article· en· W2776236592 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicnanoparticles nucleation surface interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBrock UniversityUniversity of Tehran
KeywordsHeat capacityNanoparticleMaterials scienceNanotechnologyChemical engineeringThermodynamicsPhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have calculated heat capacity of TiO 2 nanoparticles in three stable polymorphs by applying size and surface effects on heat capacity of the bulk structure.The size and surface corrections were imposed on the acoustic and optical bulk phonons, separately.The model used in the present work is a simple modification of the model proposed by Wang et al.We applied the modified model to obtain the specific heat capacity of 10-100 nm TiO 2 nanoparticles.A very good consistency is observed between the computational and experimental data.Based on the modified model, particles with sizes larger than 70 nm behave like bulk structure.In addition, the heat capacity of particles smaller than 15 nm become independent from their structure details while demonstrating a drastic increase.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.481
Threshold uncertainty score0.353

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it