MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2776255614 · doi:10.17648/eidea-14-1755

Lógica informal: uma visão geral

2017· article· pt· W2776255614 on OpenAlexaff
Ralph H. Johnson, J. Anthony Blair

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Eletrônica de Estudos Integrados em Discurso e Argumentação · 2017
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicWittgensteinian philosophy and applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p class="EIDA-caputresumo">Neste artigo, primeiramente, explicamos o que entendemos por lógica informal, discutimos equívocos e diferenciamos nossa concepção das demais; em segundo lugar, catalogamos brevemente pesquisas recentes sobre lógica informal, divididas em quatorze tópicos; em terceiro, sugerimos quatro áreas gerais de problemas e questões para futuras pesquisas; em quarto, descrevemos os atuais recursos acadêmicos para a lógica informal; em quinto, discutimos três implicações da lógica informal para a filosofia, em particular, e ressaltamos consequências práticas de modo mais geral.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.907
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0070.002
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Eletrônica de Estudos Integrados em Discurso e ArgumentaçãoSame topicWittgensteinian philosophy and applicationsFrench-language works237,207