MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2776277746 · doi:10.3917/rief.041.0095

Désengagement ou scepticisme engagé ? L’action politique et citoyenne des jeunes québécois

2017· article· fr· W2776277746 on OpenAlexaffabout
Christelle Robert-Mazaye, Stéphanie Demers, Vincent Boutonnet, David Lefrançois

Bibliographic record

VenueLa revue internationale de l éducation familiale · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceSociologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article propose de questionner l’engagement politique et citoyen des jeunes québécois en examinant les deux points suivants : 1) Existe-t-il actuellement une tendance au désengagement politique et citoyen chez les jeunes comme le suggère leur faible taux de participation aux récentes élections ? et 2) Dans un contexte de défiance vis-à-vis des structures politiques classiques, quels sont les espaces que les jeunes investissent pour former leur pensée politique et citoyenne ? Les données de la littérature indiquent que les jeunes rejettent les formes traditionnelles de participation sociale et politique, mais ne se montrent pas désintéressés de l’action citoyenne. En effet, ils s’engagent en dehors des cadres formels, en participant notamment à des communautés de discours ou à des échanges de natures sociale et politique, au sein de la famille et avec leurs pairs. Ces espaces leur offrent l’occasion d’apprendre à exprimer et consolider leur position politique et citoyenne, tout en influençant celles des autres, dont celles de leurs parents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.656
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.160
GPT teacher head0.394
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLa revue internationale de l éducation familialeSame topicSocial Sciences and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207