Les tribulations du ch’i. Réflexions sur l’insaisissable énergie
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Des pratiques alternatives comme l’acupuncture, le shiatsu et d’autres formes de massage n’ont de sens que si l’on se réfère à la conception chinoise de l’énergie. L’auteure décrit certains enjeux qui découlent de la confrontation d’une conception orientale de l’énergie avec une culture nord-américaine, et fait ressortir les défis et les vulnérabilités associés au transfert de pratiques orientales en Amérique du Nord. Elle évoque la pratique actuelle de la médecine traditionnelle par des Chinois afin de saisir le champ de référence des praticiens alternatifs d’ici et de mieux contextualiser les attentes des adeptes. Elle conclut sur les aléas d’un transfert culturel qui met en cause deux logiques antagonistes et sur les tribulations de l’indicible énergie.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".