MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2776360708 · doi:10.1353/nin.2015.0044

War on the Basepaths: The Definitive Biography of Ty Cobb by Tim Hornbaker

2015· article· en· W2776360708 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
C. Paul Rogers

Bibliographic record

VenueNine · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAmerican Sports and Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCobBBiographySubject (documents)HistoryClassicsArt historyComputer scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: War on the Basepaths: The Definitive Biography of Ty Cobb by Tim Hornbaker III C. Paul Rogers Tim Hornbaker. War on the Basepaths: The Definitive Biography of Ty Cobb. New York: Sports Publishing, 2015. 356 pp. Cloth, $24.99. Laying claim to penning the definitive biography of any important historical figure appears rather rash, given the rather fluid nature of historical and biographical research and the ability of new generations of researchers to uncover new material. But that is what Tim Hornbaker's new work on Ty Cobb asserts. Perhaps it is implicit by the use of the term "definitive" that the author really means "definitive so far," since Cobb is certainly a subject that will elicit further serious study (In fact, another substantial biography of Cobb was published in 2015: Charles Leershen's Ty Cobb: A Terrible Beauty [New York: Simon and Schuster, 2015]). Certainly most baseball historians would agree that to date, Charles Alexander's masterful 1984 biography Ty Cobb would fit that description. Without, however, comparing Alexander's biography (or others who might lay claim to the designation) to Hornbaker's, suffice to say that Hornbaker's book is an excellent look at Cobb's controversial life. It is a balanced work that reveals the complexity of the man with his many faults and his attributes, although it would be difficult to claim the latter compare to the former. For example, the standard, largely uneducated perception is that Cobb was a ruthless competitor who would do anything to win, including spiking opponents while on the bases almost at will. Hornbaker reveals, however, that Cobb did indeed have a conscience when it came to the opposition. In September 1909, he spiked Philadelphia Athletics shortstop Jack Barry while trying to steal second. The wound required four stitches to close, and afterwards Cobb was "visibly affected," refusing to eat and telling the press how sorry he was (94). Hornbacker also points out that, in spite of the contemporary press's portrayal of Cobb as "a raging, conceited baseball fiend," Cobb was unfailingly polite, humble, and almost shy when giving interviews or speeches (113). But he commonly caused resentment from his teammates on the Detroit Tigers by showing up late to spring training, if at all, and not infrequently arriving late for games. And although his will to win was legendary, teammates sometimes believed Cobb's ego got in the way of the team. That is, he sometimes strove to win games all by himself at bat or on the base paths, instead of incorporating his skills into a team effort to win. According to Hornbacker's research, this feeling was particularly acute during the 1910 season when Cobb was seeking the batting championship in a tight race against Napoleon Lajoie, with the winner to receive a Chalmers [End Page 195] automobile. His longtime teammate and frequent adversary Sam Crawford in particular felt like there was "too much Cobb" and that Cobb's zest for the batting title "spoiled teamwork as a result" (112). For his part, Cobb, with all his bluster and daring between the lines, was quite sensitive to criticism and especially being called "swell-headed," which presumably meant putting his own accomplishments ahead of the team (112–13). Cobb's sensitivity and hair-trigger temper resulted in any number of off-field confrontations and fisticuffs, which Hornbaker ably documents. Although it was a different time and ballplayer fights were much more common, Cobb was in many more than his share, almost all of which he won decisively. Several off-field incidents involved African Americans. The Georgia Peach was certainly a racist as a product of his southern upbringing, but he seems to have taken it to the extreme. It didn't play very well in Detroit and landed him in legal trouble more than once, but there is little evidence that Cobb's attitude towards blacks changed, at least during his playing career. In spite of an inflammatory press and Cobb's own substantial efforts to fuel those flames, as his playing career wore on he became regarded as one of the game's elder statesmen. Almost unimaginably given his off-field encounters, Cobb was honored...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.107

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0080.006
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0320.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNineSame topicAmerican Sports and LiteratureFrench-language works237,207