MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2776438891 · doi:10.1002/ieam.2008

In Memoriam: Peter Michael Chapman (1951–2017)

2017· article· en· W2776438891 on OpenAlexaffabout
John P. Giesy

Bibliographic record

VenueIntegrated Environmental Assessment and Management · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental and Social Impact Assessments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnthusiasmSociologyEnvironmental ethicsPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The environmental science community mourns the loss of a truly remarkable and passionate environmental scientist and beloved father and husband. Peter Michael Chapman left us far too early on 26 September 2017 at his home in North Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Throughout his environmental science and consulting career, Peter never slowed down. He dedicated his career at top speed to questioning the status quo, proposing unique solutions, and spearheading research in the field of environmental science. He was a prolific writer and editor; his contributions included hundreds of scientific articles and book chapters, as well as leadership at countless technical meetings. He delivered engaging keynote talks worldwide that purposely challenged his audiences. He encouraged and mentored young scientists with enthusiasm. He inspired and supported colleagues and peers around the world with his incredible work ethic, his energy, and his tremendous vigor. Peter was born in 1951 in Hull, England, but spent a large portion of his childhood in Cuba (where he became fluent in Spanish), and later in the Philippines and South Florida, USA. Peter eventually found himself in the city of Victoria, Canada, where he earned his PhD in 1979 in benthic ecology with an emphasis on ecotoxicology and risk assessment at the University of Victoria. Although he retained his British citizenship, Peter was proud to be a Canadian and would often remark, “The world needs more Canada.” He was passionate about British Columbia, and made it his home for the rest of his life. His environmental consulting career began at EVS Environment Consultants in nearby Vancouver, where he became a partner. EVS was one of the earliest science-focused environmental consulting companies in North America and an influential part of the early careers of many successful environment professionals, leading to the formation of multiple ecology and risk consulting companies thereafter. Twenty-five years later, EVS merged with Golder Associates, where Peter would work another 10 years as a principal before retiring to his independent consulting practice in 2014. At the core of Peter's work was a fundamental faith in science. He challenged scientific information constantly throughout his career. He also challenged those who would rely, often blindly, on science for decision making, urging them to adhere faithfully to principles fundamental to the scientific method: observe, measure, verify, and improve. Peter abhorred bias of any sort. His strong conviction that bridges were needed between science and problem-solving in society was instrumental in shaping the Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry's (SETAC) second peer-reviewed publication, IEAM, in 2004. The journal—so much like Peter—is dedicated to bridging the gap between scientific research and the use of science for management of the environment. Peter will be remembered as a stalwart supporter of SETAC, and a moving force behind the SETAC student mentor program and the SETAC Student/Mentor dinner event at each annual meeting. Peter's passion for scientific discourse inspired the “Learned Discourse” feature in the Society's early member newsletter, and later in the IEAM journal; he edited the content continuously for 30 years. He was recognized for these and other contributions to the Society with the SETAC Founder's Award in 2001. He was named a SETAC Fellow in 2013. When I congratulated him on his Founders Award, Peter remarked that he considered the recognition—outside of his family—to be among his most treasured honors. Peter viewed his role as a SETAC Fellow as an obligation: an obligation to get the science right; to be honest, truthful, and fair; to share one's knowledge; and to have respect for the environment and everyone and everything with whom we share it. “Everyone,” Peter often noted, “has the potential and obligation to leave the world a better place than it was when they arrived.” Peter will be remembered as an expert and leader in the field of ecological risk assessment and benthic ecology. He introduced the scientific and regulatory communities to methods for assessment of sediment quality that remain the state of the practice around the world. With Ed Long, Peter pioneered the “Sediment Quality Triad,” internationally recognized to this day as a sound approach for evaluation of sediment quality in streams, rivers, and oceans. Peter was an equally powerful advocate for expanding Triad concepts into weight-of-evidence approaches for all aspects of ecological risk assessment. He was a key contributor to the development of the science of evaluating the fate and effects of contaminants in sediment. He encouraged new paradigms for environmental monitoring and assessment and for the development and use of quantitative tools for data analysis, and he had an early appreciation of the significance of climate change on ecosystems. Peter lived a full life. I dare to say as we look back on Peter's 66 years and the many adventures and honors that he enjoyed, few of us will achieve as much if we lived to 100. He was a leader, scholar, researcher, author, editor, educator, mentor, lecturer, entrepreneur, consultant, and of course to many of us, a valued colleague and dear friend. Peter moved among these roles with such élan. I suspect he would be happy with the moniker, “Peter Chapman: citizen of the world, husband, father, and scientist.” I am left with a memory of Peter's infectious smile and that impish glint in his eye. It was the look of a gifted and wise person extoling the rest of us to move onward, always learning, and so we will. Peter will be greatly missed. In honor of his devotion to the scientific and academic communities, an endowment has been created in Peter's name at SETAC. Contributions to the Peter Chapman Endowment Fund can be made online (https://www.setac.org/donations/fund.asp?id=16239). Thanks to Peter's many colleagues for their review and input, with special gratitude to Keith Solomon, Beth Power, and Blair McDonald. John P Giesy Professor, Canada Research Chair in Environmental Toxicology Department of Veterinary Biomedical Sciences and Toxicology Centre University of Saskatchewan, Canada

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.125
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIntegrated Environmental Assessment and ManagementSame topicEnvironmental and Social Impact AssessmentsFrench-language works237,207