MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2776464807 · doi:10.1109/cns.2017.8228682

Privacy aware web services in the cloud

2017· article· en· W2776464807 on OpenAlexaff
Farshad Rahimi Asl, Fei Chiang, Wenbo He, Reza Samavi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCryptography and Data Security
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceObfuscationCloud computingEncryptionComputer securityInformation privacyWeb serviceCloud computing securityService providerPrivacy softwareInternet privacyPrivacy by DesignData securityService (business)World Wide WebBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Data privacy and security continues to hinder wider adoption of cloud based web services for small to medium businesses. Existing privacy aware systems for cloud environments either assume that web service providers are trustworthy and can adequately enforce a client's privacy policies or adapt computationally expensive encryption techniques to minimize data security risks. In this paper, we propose, PASiC, a framework for Privacy Aware RESTful Web Services in the Cloud. PASiC provides lightweight data privacy features by allowing clients to define their specific privacy policies, obfuscation/encryption methods and collaboratively engage with the service providers to enforce these policies. Our framework is designed to facilitate integration with legacy systems. Our experimental evaluation shows that PASiC safeguards sensitive data throughout the data staging process, and show how it operates over different methods of encryption and obfuscation in terms of their performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.804
Threshold uncertainty score0.673

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCryptography and Data SecurityFrench-language works237,207