MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2776472365 · doi:10.5430/ijba.v9n1p14

A Study of the Development of Accounting Higher Education in Brazil: A View of graduation to the Doctorate

2017· article· en· W2776472365 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Marcia Helena de Andrade Couto, Fernando Silva Lima, Gustavo Henrique Silva Santana, Kaique Felipe Da Cruz Rabelo

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Business Administration · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicBusiness and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGraduation (instrument)IncentiveHigher educationAccountingGraduate educationCarry (investment)SociologyQualitative researchMedical educationPolitical scienceManagementPedagogyBusinessEconomicsEconomic growthSocial scienceEngineeringFinanceMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study sought to address the development of accounting education in the Brazilian scenario. A methodology applied to the analytical method, however, with a quantitative and qualitative approach. The results showed that masters programs are more offered by public higher education institutions, a reality that is controversial for a graduate. The Research concludes that it is necessary to carry out a strategy and incentives to increase as vacancies in the Masters and Doctoral Programs in Brazil.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.395
Threshold uncertainty score0.227

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.170
GPT teacher head0.457
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Business AdministrationSame topicBusiness and Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207