MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2776502014 · doi:10.1002/cjce.23118

Enhanced adsorption of xylenol orange from aqueous solutions by polyethylenimine‐grafted chitosan microspheres

2017· article· en· W2776502014 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xueqing Yu, Yingjun Jing, Hui Gao

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Hebei Province
KeywordsPolyethylenimineAdsorptionCationic polymerizationAqueous solutionXylenol orangeChemistryChitosanAmine gas treatingLangmuir adsorption modelNuclear chemistryMethyl orangeDesorptionPolymer chemistryOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract To enhance the adsorption performance, chitosan microspheres (CS–MSs) were grafted with polyethylenimine (PEI), a cationic compound with abundant amine groups. The resulting PEI‐grafted CS–MSs (PEI–CS–MSs) were used for the adsorption of xylenol orange (XO), an anionic dye. The results show that PEI–CS–MSs were in regular spherical shape without porous structure. XO molecules were adsorbed onto the amine groups of PEI–CS–MSs through electrostatic interaction. The maximum adsorption capacity of XO onto PEI–CS–MSs was 816.33 mg/g at 303 K, being much higher than that onto CS–MSs. The adsorption process could be properly described by the pseudo‐second‐order kinetic and Langmuir models. The adsorption of XO was a spontaneous process with exothermic nature. In addition, the adsorption capacity only decreased by 0.52 % after seven cycles of adsorption‐desorption, indicating the excellent reusability of PEI–CS–MSs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalFrench-language works237,207