MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2776612832 · doi:10.3138/jcs.2016-0009.r2

The Radio Host and Piloted Listening in the Digital Age: CBC Radio 3 and Its Online Listening Community

2017· article· en· W2776612832 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Brian Fauteux

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Canadian Studies · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRadio, Podcasts, and Digital Media
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsActive listeningConversationHost (biology)Radio programCommunity radioSociologyTelecommunicationsMultimediaMedia studiesComputer scienceCommunication

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On 9 March 2015, CBC Radio 3 host Grant Lawrence announced that the network would be discontinuing hosting from its programming and would move to an automated stream of music. The cutting of finances and personnel raises questions about the ability of public stations to connect with listeners and circulate the creative work of their citizenry. By tracking the activity of Radio 3’s listener community over the course of 2015, this article argues that a radio host maintains a fundamental presence that facilitates conversation and contextualizes new and independent music. The radio host is deemed, by his or her listener community, to be an authoritative and credible individual who guides or pilots the listening experience and the related online conversation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.756
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.101
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Canadian StudiesSame topicRadio, Podcasts, and Digital MediaFrench-language works237,207