MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2776976309 · doi:10.12783/shm2017/14013

Validating 3D Photonic Crystals for Structural Health Monitoring

2017· article· en· W2776976309 on OpenAlexaff
Valentina Piccolo, Andrea Chiappini, Alessandro Vaccari, Antonio Calà Lesina, Maurizio Ferrari, Luca Deseri, Daniele Zonta

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhotonic Crystals and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotonic crystalPhotonicsComputer scienceOptoelectronicsMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A photonic crystal (PhC) is a periodic structure with nanometric periodicity comparable with the wavelength of light, having a photonic band gap in the visible range: in practice, it reflects selectively only a band of the incident light, thus appearing to the observer of a determinate color. In this contribution, we propose to use photonic crystals as a colorimetric sensitive material for Structural Heath Monitoring. The idea is based on the observation that any distortion in the crystal structure produces a change in the reflected light bandwidth, resulting in turn in a change in its apparent color, visible to naked eyes. In a near future, we will be able to speed a photonic sensitive material on the surface of a structure in the form of a thin paint layer, and directly measure any variation in the strain field by simply observing change in color. To demonstrate this concept, we first we introduce the basic formulation that controls the photo-mechanical behavior of a 3D photonic structures. Next, we demonstrate the feasibility of the fabrication of a PhC made of sub-micrometric polystyrene colloidal spheres in a PDMS matrix on a rubber substrate. Through laboratory experiments, we show that the photonic properties of the crystal change with substrate elongation according to theoretical prediction. Lastly, we introduce a Finite Difference Time Domain (FDTD) analysis method to simulate the opto-mechanical response of a generic photonic crystal design, through direct integration Maxwell's equations, and validated the method compering the numerical results to the experimental data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.360
Threshold uncertainty score0.919

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhotonic Crystals and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207