MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2776985161 · doi:10.5267/j.esm.2017.11.004

Finite element prediction of curing micro-residual stress distribution in polymeric composites considering hybrid interphase region

2017· article· en· W2776985161 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
V. Teimouri, Majid Safarabadi

Bibliographic record

VenueEngineering Solid Mechanics · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEpoxy Resin Curing Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceComposite materialCuring (chemistry)Finite element methodInterphaseResidual stressStress (linguistics)Structural engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The interphase is a region between fibers and a matrix, which has different properties from the matrix and the fibers, but is dependent on them.Considering the interphase region has a significant effect on the accuracy of obtained residual stresses.So far, in order to obtain the micromechanical residual stresses, the interphase properties are considered as an average.In this paper, the properties of the interphase are assumed variable by using a suitable UMAT code in the ABAQUS software.The equations of previous studies that have acquired interphase properties to be variable are used to write the UMAT code.A representative volume element (RVE) in polymer composites is modeled in three phases in the ABAQUS software and the interphase properties are considered as FGM by using the UMAT code.Temperature variation during curing to environment temperature is the only loading factor in the RVE.The matrix, fiber and interphase stresses are obtained in the ABAQUS software.The achieved stresses were compared with the results of previous studies that considered interphase properties as average.Finite element and energy methods were used in previous papers but in the present study just the finite element method with variable interphase properties was use.In addition, residual stress diagrams with the variable interphase properties are plotted to study the effect of the thermal expansion coefficient.The results of this study are similar to those in previous ones, and the curves are improved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEngineering Solid MechanicsSame topicEpoxy Resin Curing ProcessesFrench-language works237,207