Abstract 205: Feasibility and Testing of a Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Derived Cardiac Patch in a Pre-clinical Swine Model of CHF
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Previously we have demonstrated that a tissue engineered heart patch comprised of human induced pluripotent stem cell derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs) and fibroblasts improves both left ventricular (LV) systolic and diastolic function in a rat model of CHF. In this study we tested the feasibility of upscaling cardiac patch size and surgical deployment in a swine model of CHF to test clinical utility. Methods: Four male Gottingen mini swine 20-25kg and three domestic swine 50-60kg were infarcted using percutaneous methods. Embolizing coils were deployed via catheter distal to the first diagonal branch of the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery and animals recovered for 4 weeks. Cardiac patches engineered with bio absorbable polygalactin-910 knitted mesh, dermal fibroblasts and hiPSC-CMs were cultured and implanted on the infarcted epicardium 4 weeks after MI. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was performed at baseline, 4 and 8 weeks post MI. All swine were implanted with continuous event recorders to acquire surface electrocardiogram during the entire study. In addition quality of life and functional capacity were assessed through video monitoring and treadmill exertion testing respectively. Infarct size was determined through 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining. Results: LAD occlusion resulted in a significant (P<0.05) decrease EF (15%), and increase in EDV (59%) and ESV (100%). Average TIMI score decreased from 3.0±0 at time of MI to 1.5±0.6 4wks post MI. Cardiac patches were upsized to 6cm diameter for application in the swine. Patches displayed synchronous and spontaneous contractions within 48hrs. The 6cm patches, when implanted effectively covered the infarcted region bridging viable myocardium. Surgical handling and epicardial deployment was successfully accomplished via median sternotomy. The patches were robust in nature and could be deployed via a minimally invasive robotic procedure. No adverse arrhythmic activity was observed. Implantation of the cardiac patch restored activity levels (quality of life) of patch treated swine vs CHF controls. Conclusion: Our hiPSC-CM cardiac patch can be constructed in a clinical size, easily handled and implanted on the epicardium of the infarcted heart.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".