MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2777056046 · doi:10.1177/0954410017712329

Type-2 fuzzy adaptive sliding mode control of hypersonic flight

2017· article· en· W2777056046 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part G Journal of Aerospace Engineering · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Parametric statisticsHypersonic speedRobustness (evolution)Sliding mode controlFuzzy logicFuzzy control systemAdaptive controlComputer scienceNonlinear systemLyapunov functionHypersonic flightControl engineeringEngineeringControl (management)MathematicsArtificial intelligenceAerospace engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a type-2 fuzzy adaptive sliding mode control scheme for tracking control of hypersonic aircraft with uncertainties. This method uses full-state feedback to linearize the nonlinear model of hypersonic aircraft. Combining the interval type-2 fuzzy approach and adaptive sliding mode control keeps the system stable in the existence of uncertain parameters. For rapid stabilization of the system, the adaptive laws are designed using a direct constructive Lyapunov analysis together with a well-established type-2 fuzzy logic control. Simulation test results indicate that the proposed control scheme provides enhancement of robustness to parametric uncertainty and improvement in tracking performance of the hypersonic aircraft.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.196
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it