Community reorganization in forest understories buried by volcanic tephra
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Disturbance is a key factor contributing to community organization. Deposition of tephra (aerially transported volcanic ejecta) is a widespread disturbance of global relevance, but its effects on ecosystems have received limited attention. We studied forest understory community change for 30 yr following tephra deposition from the 1980 eruptions of Mount St. Helens (Washington State). Four old‐growth, subalpine conifer stands had a wide range of initial damage and patterns of community re‐development. We measured understory diversity, structure, and species composition and calculated relationships of plant cover with environment and cover of other plants. Overall, those communities that were altered greatly by tephra tended to converge with time on their pre‐eruption characteristics; however, substantial divergence occurred in some situations. For example, moss cover failed to reach pre‐eruption levels in all stands, whereas importance and diversity of woody plants sometimes greatly exceeded pre‐eruption values. Plant–environment relationships that were significant before the eruption disappeared and did not re‐develop. Smaller plants were more affected by environment than larger ones. Relationships before the eruption and also 30 yr after the eruption were primarily with other plant species, whereas relationships just after the eruption were with tephra depth and factors that modified its impact. Understory plant importance was usually lower beneath a tree canopy than in gaps, but there was little sign of interference from understory growth forms. Post‐eruption soil disturbance usually increased understory plant importance, while woody debris sometimes decreased herb and tree seedling cover. Tephra deposition, which did not immediately kill canopy trees, differed from the disturbances usually studied (e.g., fire, windthrow, bark beetles). Even so, these lessons from our study should be widely applicable: Similar species may respond differently; minor, early environmental differences may induce major, long‐term community change; successional trajectories may diverge from the pre‐disturbance community; and secondary disturbances may modify successional trajectories.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".