MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2777242506 · doi:10.1039/c7cc08992a

A dual-cell device designed as an oxidase mimic and its use for the study of oxidase-like nanozymes

2017· article· en· W2777242506 on OpenAlexaff
Hankun Yang, Jingyu Xiao, Junpeng Shi, Tong Shu, Lei Su, Qingye Lu, Xueji Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Communications · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvanced Nanomaterials in Catalysis
Canadian institutionsCalgary Laboratory ServicesUniversity of Calgary
FundersBeijing Municipal Science and Technology CommissionNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsDual (grammatical number)ChemistryOxidase testCellCombinatorial chemistryNanotechnologyBiophysicsBiochemistryMaterials scienceEnzymeBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A dual-cell device has been designed as an oxidase-like mimic with the oxidation of 3,3',5,5'-tetramethylbenzidine as a model reaction. This dual-cell device could be also used to study oxidase-like nanozymes. It was found that only the catalytic sites for oxygen reduction are essential and necessary for oxidase-like nanozymes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.783

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.099
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemical CommunicationsSame topicAdvanced Nanomaterials in CatalysisFrench-language works237,207