MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2777325319 · doi:10.4000/jso.7745

Les relations familiales en ville sont brokbrok : partage de nourriture et contribution à Port-Vila, Vanuatu

2017· article· fr· W2777325319 on OpenAlexaff
Daniela Kraemer

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal de la Société des océanistes · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesSociologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les jeunes sous-scolarisés et sous-employés de Port-Vila font souvent référence à la « casserole vide » pour refléter les problèmes sociaux rencontrés dans le milieu urbain d’aujourd’hui : coût de la vie élevé, aliénation des terres agricoles, taux de chômage important et insécurité financière. À Freswota, la casserole vide témoigne aussi des changements au niveau des relations familiales, souvent générées et maintenues par un système de partage de nourriture. Ici, comme dans dans la majeure partie de Port-Vila, les familles sont confrontées à la difficulté de trouver un équilibre entre leurs revenus et l’obligation de donner et de recevoir. Des familles urbaines privent ainsi de nourriture certains de leurs membres (vus comme consommant sans produire). Ces contraintes de la vie urbaine et l’influence de la notion émique de « contribution », dans un contexte de capitalisme néolibéral et de relations intergénérationnelles, font que les jeunes citadins sans emploi voient leur famille comme incapables de les soutenir et, par conséquent, de nouvelles relations au sein de la communauté se renforcent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.245
Threshold uncertainty score0.487

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal de la Société des océanistesSame topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207