MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Феномен проблемы с позиции радикального конструктивизма

2013· article· en· W27775315 on OpenAlex
Ардашкин Игорь Борисович

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueИзвестия Томского политехнического университета. Инжиниринг георесурсов · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Social Development in Ukraine
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsExplicationEpistemologyConstructivism (international relations)AssertionSubject (documents)Interpretation (philosophy)Relevance (law)CognitionConstructivist teaching methodsPsychologyPhilosophy of sciencePhilosophyMathematics educationComputer scienceTeaching method

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Volumetric properties of proteins bear directly on their biological functions in hyperbaric environments and are useful in general as a biophysical probe. To gain insight into conformation-dependent protein volume, we developed an implicit-solvent atomic chain model that transparently embodies two physical origins of volume: (1) a fundamental geometric term capturing the van der Waals volume of the protein and the particulate, finite-size nature of the water molecules, modeled together by the volume encased by the protein's molecular surface, and (2) a physicochemical term for other solvation effects, accounted for by empirical proportionality relationships between experimental partial molar volumes and solvent-accessible surface areas of model compounds. We tested this construct by Langevin dynamics simulations of a 16-residue polyalanine. The simulated trajectories indicate an average volume decrease of 1.73 ± 0.1 Å<sup>3</sup>/residue for coil-helix transition, ∼80% of which is caused by a decrease in geometric void/cavity volume, and a robust positive activation volume for helical hydrogen bond formation originating from the transient void created by an approaching donor-acceptor pair and nearby atoms. These findings are consistent with prior experiments with alanine-rich peptides and offer an atomistic analysis of the observed overall volume changes. The results suggest, in general, that hydrostatic pressure likely stabilizes helical conformations of short peptides but slows the process of helix formation. In contrast, hydrostatic pressure is more likely to destabilize natural globular proteins because of the void volume entrapped in their folded structures. The conceptual framework of our model thus affords a coherent physical rationalization for experiments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.615
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.017

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it