MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2777602455

The Effect of Pulse Configuration on the Compound Muscle Action Potentials (Cmaps) During Magnetic Stimulation

2002· article· en· W2777602455 on OpenAlexaff
Nafia Al-Mutawaly, Hubert de Bruin, Gary Hasey

Bibliographic record

VenueCMBES Proceedings · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStimulationElectromagnetic coilPulse (music)Nuclear magnetic resonanceDepolarizationMaterials scienceBiomedical engineeringChemistryAnatomyPhysicsNeuroscienceBiophysicsOpticsMedicineBiologyDetector
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Magnetic stimulation has proven to be effective in diagnostics and treatment in many clinical applications. In these applications, two types of pulse configurations are utilized: bi-phasic and mono-phasic. The former is mostly applied to nerves with high thresholds of depolarization or lying deep within tissue structures, while the latter is used to excite peripheral nerves. In this paper, the results of applying bi-phasic and mono-phasic pulses and their influences on the compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) are discussed. The experimental variables are: coil current rate of change (di/dt), coil type (Figure 8 and circular coils), and coil current direction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCMBES ProceedingsSame topicAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207