MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2777602455

The Effect of Pulse Configuration on the Compound Muscle Action Potentials (Cmaps) During Magnetic Stimulation

2002· article· en· W2777602455 on OpenAlex
Nafia Al-Mutawaly, Hubert de Bruin, Gary Hasey

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCMBES Proceedings · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStimulationElectromagnetic coilPulse (music)Nuclear magnetic resonanceDepolarizationMaterials scienceBiomedical engineeringChemistryAnatomyPhysicsNeuroscienceBiophysicsOpticsMedicineBiologyDetector
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Magnetic stimulation has proven to be effective in diagnostics and treatment in many clinical applications. In these applications, two types of pulse configurations are utilized: bi-phasic and mono-phasic. The former is mostly applied to nerves with high thresholds of depolarization or lying deep within tissue structures, while the latter is used to excite peripheral nerves. In this paper, the results of applying bi-phasic and mono-phasic pulses and their influences on the compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) are discussed. The experimental variables are: coil current rate of change (di/dt), coil type (Figure 8 and circular coils), and coil current direction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.090
Threshold uncertainty score0.252

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it