Modeling the Effects of Age and Sex on Normal Pediatric Brain Metabolism Using<sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reference databases of pediatric brain metabolism are uncommon, because local brain metabolism evolves significantly with age throughout childhood, limiting their clinical applicability. The aim of this study was to develop mathematic models of regional relative brain metabolism using pediatric 18F-FDG PET with CT data of normal pediatric brains, accounting for sex and age. Methods: PET/CT brain acquisitions were obtained from 88 neurologically normal subjects, aged 6 mo to 18 y. Subjects were assigned to either a development group (n = 59) or a validation group (n = 29). For each subject, commercially available software was used to quantify the relative metabolism of 47 separate brain regions using whole-brain–normalized (WBN) and pons-normalized (PN) activity. The effects of age on regional relative brain metabolism were modeled using multiple linear and nonlinear mathematic equations, and the significance of sex was assessed using the Student t test. Optimal models were selected using the Akaike information criterion. Mean predicted values and 95% prediction intervals were derived for all regions. Model predictions were compared with the validation dataset, and mean predicted error was calculated for all regions using both WBN and PN models. Results: As a function of age, optimal models of regional relative brain metabolism were linear for 9 regions, quadratic for 13, cubic for 6, logarithmic for 12, power law for 7, and modified power law for 2 using WBN data and were linear for 9, quadratic for 25, cubic for 2, logarithmic for 6, and power law for 4 using PN data. Sex differences were found to be statistically significant only in the posterior cingulate cortex for the WBN data. Comparing our models with the validation group resulted in 94.3% of regions falling within the 95% prediction interval for WBN and 94.1% for PN. For all brain regions in the validation group, the error in prediction was 3% ± 0.96% using WBN data and 4.72% ± 1.25% when compared with the PN data (P < 0.0001). Conclusion: Pediatric brain metabolism is a complex function of age and sex. We have developed mathematic models of brain activity that allow for accurate prediction of regional pediatric brain metabolism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".