MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2777653934 · doi:10.1093/ahr/122.5.1587

Christina Elizabeth Firpo. The Uprooted: Race, Children, and Imperialism in French Indochina, 1890–1980.

2017· article· en· W2777653934 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nguyḛ̂n Thị Ðiê̹u

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Historical Review · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsColonialismContemptIndigenousRace (biology)VietnameseGender studiesMemoirEmpireCitizenshipHistoryIdentity (music)EthnologyPolitical scienceSociologyAncient historyPoliticsLawArtArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Colonialism could leave lasting imprints, material and immaterial embodiments of itself, in the society of both colonizers and colonized long after the occupation had ended and the colonizers had departed. Among these were the children of the unions—coerced or consenting—between occupier and occupied, who are called métis in French and con lai (“of mixed blood”) in Vietnamese, with both terms carrying undertones of contempt in the so-called pure-blooded societies. In recent years, the exploration of this topic has yielded a literature that cross-pollinates between fields of study about race, gender, identity, sexuality, and colonialism in empires established by the Western powers and Japan in Africa and Asia. France’s Indochinese empire is no exception, exerting a strong fascination among scholars and the public alike through works and memoirs about the métis, a community that belongs neither here nor there but benefits in status from French citizenship. Christina Elizabeth Firpo’s The Uprooted: Race, Children, and Imperialism in French Indochina, 1890–1980, contributes to the development of these fields by focusing on a relatively unfamiliar facet, namely the French “protection societies” that were founded in Indochina toward the end of the pacification campaigns in the 1890s, aimed at removing “fatherless métis children from the indigenous milieu” to consign them to a separate “institutional system … for Eurasian métis” (4, 22). Created by French civilians and colonial authorities at a time when the presence of tens of thousands of French soldiers in the field had yielded a small métis community, these “protection societies” considered it their duty to “save” these children, who were not recognized by their fathers and, according to the law of July 24, 1889, had de facto been “abandoned” by them (26). These institutions, at first predominantly Catholic orphanages run by French nuns and then laic associations, were to raise the children into “little Frenchmen,” inculcated with petit-bourgeois French values and insulated from the allegedly corroding influences of their indigenous families and environment (91).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.242
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0060.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Historical ReviewSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207