Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé Les regroupements de jeunes sont à la fois divers et changeants, au gré de leur composition du moment, des espaces fréquentés et des contextes auxquels ils sont soumis. L’urbanité des situations est donc relative à ces différents facteurs. Cependant, les tensions qui traversent les rassemblements semblent mettre à nu une « hospitalité de confrontation », mêlant promiscuité socio-spatiale et souci de différenciation. D’une part, ils reposent sur une « gestion permanente du conflit potentiel », gage de leur survie. D’autre part, les sociabilités qui s’y déploient reposent sur une « familiarité a priori » qui atténue le devoir de catégorisation propre aux relations urbaines. Enfin, ils fonctionnent de manière centrifuge, mettant en mouvement les jeunes qui les côtoient. Ces qualités semblent faire du rassemblement un « espace public pratique », mettant à l’épreuve les rapports de dépendance ou d’autonomie des liens sociaux par rapport aux lieux.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.032 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".