Rigid Body Motions and Local Compliance Response during Impact of Two Deformable Spheres
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The impact of two hard deformable spheres is revisited with the aim of investigating the constituent rigid body motions and indentation response of each sphere during collision. The latter are determined theoretically and the theoretical solutions are validated by comparing with numerical solutions of the coupled nonlinear dynamic models for impact of two hard deformable spheres. For elastic impact events, normalized tabulated solutions are derived using the Force Indentation Linearisation Method (FILM) and the tabulated solutions can be used to generate actual rigid body motions and indentation histories for each of the colliding spheres without need for numerical or finite element solutions. The analysis shows that the rigid body motion and local compliance response of each sphere depend on: (a) ratio of mass of sphere to effective mass of impact system, and (b) ratio of initial velocity of sphere to initial relative velocity of impact system. Finally, the 2-D collision problem is discussed and a simple procedure to determine the unique solution of all four unknowns is presented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it