MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2777712302 · doi:10.1097/inf.0000000000001874

Immunogenicity and Safety of the Quadrivalent Human Papillomavirus Vaccine in Girls Living With HIV

2017· article· en· W2777712302 on OpenAlexafffund
Jason Brophy, Ari Bitnun, Ariane Alimenti, Normand Lapointe, Lindy Samson, Stanley Read, Christos Karatzios, Simon Dobson, Erin Moses, Sandra Blitz, Nancy-Grace Lipsky, Gina Ogilvie, Sharon Walmsley, Janet Raboud, Deborah Money

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCervical Cancer and HPV Research
Canadian institutionsPublic Health OntarioCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchBC Centre for Disease ControlUniversity Health NetworkChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioB.C. Women's Hospital & Health CentreUniversity of OttawaMcGill University Health CentreUniversity of TorontoMontreal Children's HospitalHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineWomen's Health Research InstituteUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchGilead SciencesStyrelsen för Internationellt Utvecklingssamarbete
KeywordsImmunogenicityMedicineHuman papillomavirus vaccineHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Human papillomavirusAntibodyVirologyAntibody responseImmunologyLentivirusSidaViral diseaseInternal medicineCervical cancerGardasil

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We evaluated quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine seroresponses among 35 girls living with HIV (9-13 years of ages) and compared with data on girls without HIV, as part of a subgroup analysis. The quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine was safe and well tolerated. However, antibody response was significantly lower in girls living with HIV relative to girls without HIV. HIV virologic suppression predicted better antibody response.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.804

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Pediatric Infectious Disease JournalSame topicCervical Cancer and HPV ResearchFrench-language works237,207