¿Hay que incorporar a nietzsche a la hermenéutica? Razones de una pequeña resistencia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El tema del lugar de Nietzsche en la hermenéutica implica varias cuestiones: ¿el pensamiento de Nietzsche puede ser caracterizado como «hermenéutico»?, y ¿en qué medida, dado que la hermenéutica sólo ha sido desarollada como tal después de él? ¿Puede y debe la hermenéutica, que hasta hace poco no ha tenido muy en cuenta su pensamiento, incorporarlo todo entero? Si bien una fecundación mutua sería siempre fructífera, este trabajo defiende que deberíamos resistir frente a una integración simple en la hermenéutica, teniendo en cuenta su diferente manera de entender la verdad, la interpretación y el nihilismo. De este modo también se hace posible una resistencia frente a la concepción postmoderna y nihilista de la hermenéutica. Siendo conscientes de sus diferencias, la hermenéutica y Nietzsche tendrían mucho que contribuir uno a otro.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.054 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.013 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".