MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2777774042

Abstract 17523: Pregnancy Outcomes in Women With Regurgitant Valve Lesions

2016· article· en· W2777774042 on OpenAlexaffabout
Angelo Dave Javier, Jasmine Grewal, Nadia Gabarin, Jack M. Colman, Marla Kiess, Rachel D Wald, Jennifer Mason, Matthew Sermer, Samuel C. Siu, Candice K. Silversides

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityMount Sinai HospitalSt. Paul's HospitalQueen's UniversityUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRegurgitation (circulation)CardiologyInternal medicineAdverse effectHeart diseaseHeart failureAortic valvevalvular heart diseaseHeart valvePregnancy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Pregnancy outcomes in women with significant regurgitant valve lesions have not been well defined. The primary objective of this study is to determine the frequency of maternal adverse cardiac events in pregnant women with significant regurgitant valve lesions. We also aim to describe obstetric and fetal/neonatal adverse outcomes in this population. Methods: Women with heart disease enrolled in a prospective study on pregnancy outcomes (Toronto and Vancouver, Canada) with moderate or greater regurgitant valve lesion were included. Women with coexisting significant stenotic lesions were excluded. Multivalve disease was defined as more than one regurgitant valve lesion. Adverse maternal cardiac events included: pulmonary edema or right heart failure requiring treatment, sustained or symptomatic tachyarrhythmia requiring treatment, cardiac arrest, or cardiac death. Results: There were 462 completed pregnancies in women with moderate or greater valvular regurgitation (mean maternal age 29.6 ± 5.7 years); 73% (337/462) of women had congenital heart disease and 13% (59/462) had rheumatic heart disease. Pregnancies were classified according to the most significant regurgitant valve lesions: systemic atrioventricular (AV) valve regurgitation (n=149), subpulmonary AV valve regurgitation (n=91), aortic valve regurgitation (n=44), pulmonary valve regurgitation (n=104), and multivalve regurgitation (n=74). Adverse cardiac events complicated 13% (61/462) of pregnancies. Among pregnancies in women with isolated regurgitant valve lesions, adverse maternal cardiac events occurred in 15% of women with systemic AV valve regurgitation, 13% with subpulmonary AV valve regurgitation, 5% with aortic regurgitation and 4% with pulmonary regurgitation. Adverse cardiac events were highest in women with multivalve disease (27%). Adverse fetal/neonatal and obstetric complications occurred in 22% and 9% of pregnancies, respectively. Conclusions: Women with moderate or greater AV valve regurgitation are at risk for cardiac complications during pregnancy. Pregnancies in women with aortic and pulmonary valve regurgitation are usually well tolerated. Women with more than one regurgitant valve lesion are at highest risk for complications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.199
Threshold uncertainty score0.369

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicCardiovascular Issues in PregnancyFrench-language works237,207