MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2777806057 · doi:10.18192/uojm.v7i2.2198

Genito-Pelvic Pain/Penetration Disorder (GPPPD): An Overview of Current Terminology, Etiology, and Treatment

2017· article· en· W2777806057 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Celine Conforti

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Ottawa Journal of Medicine · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSexual function and dysfunction studies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVaginismusPelvic painGynecologyEtiologyPsychosocialConfusionVulvodyniaPsychological interventionPhysical therapySexual dysfunctionSurgeryPsychiatryPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Genito-Pelvic Pain/Penetration Disorder (GPPPD) is a relatively new diagnostic category of female sexual dysfunction, which was introduced during the release of the DSM-5 in 2013. GPPPD reflects the combination of two previous categories of female sexual dysfunction, dyspareunia and vaginismus, into one entity. As such, there is confusion surrounding the proper terminology and diagnostic criteria used when evaluating female sexual or genital pain. This review article attempts to clarify the terminologies used within the medical and scientific community, and provides an overview of current views on etiology and treatment. The likely biological antecedents to genital pain are an exaggerated and prolonged inflammatory response in the vestibular mucosa causing neuroproliferation, and leading to eventual hyperalgesia, allodynia, and pelvic muscle tension in the genital region. These processes interact with psychosocial factors to produce chronic pain. Treatment includes education, CBT, pelvic floor physiotherapy, medical interventions, and surgical interventions, though sexual function may be optimized through a multifaceted approach. RésuméLa GPPPD est une catégorie diagnostique relativement récente de la dysfonction sexuelle féminine, qui a été introduite dans le DSM-5 en 2013. La GPPPD reflète la combinaison de deux catégories précédentes de dysfonctionnement sexuel féminin, la dyspareunie et le vaginisme, en une entité. En tant que tel, il existe une confusion entourant la terminologie appropriée et les critères de diagnostique utilisés lors de l’évaluation de la douleur sexuelle ou génitale féminine. Cet article de revue tente de clarifier les terminologies utilisées dans la communauté médicale et scientifique et donne un aperçu des points de vue actuels sur l’étiologie et le traitement. Les antécédents biologiques probables à la douleur génitale sont une réponse inflammatoire exagérée et prolongée dans la muqueuse vestibulaire entraînant une neuroprolifération, et conduisant à une éventuelle hyperalgésie, allodynie et tension musculaire pelvienne dans la région génitale. Ces processus interagissent avec des facteurs psychosociaux pour produire une dou- leur chronique. Le traitement comprend l’éducation, la TCC, la physiothérapie du plancher pelvien, les interventions médicales et les interventions chirurgicales, bien que la fonction sexuelle puisse être optimisée par une approche multidimensionnelle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.132
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Ottawa Journal of MedicineSame topicSexual function and dysfunction studiesFrench-language works237,207