MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2777806057 · doi:10.18192/uojm.v7i2.2198

Genito-Pelvic Pain/Penetration Disorder (GPPPD): An Overview of Current Terminology, Etiology, and Treatment

2017· article· en· W2777806057 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Ottawa Journal of Medicine · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSexual function and dysfunction studies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVaginismusPelvic painGynecologyEtiologyPsychosocialConfusionVulvodyniaPsychological interventionPhysical therapySexual dysfunctionSurgeryPsychiatryPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Genito-Pelvic Pain/Penetration Disorder (GPPPD) is a relatively new diagnostic category of female sexual dysfunction, which was introduced during the release of the DSM-5 in 2013. GPPPD reflects the combination of two previous categories of female sexual dysfunction, dyspareunia and vaginismus, into one entity. As such, there is confusion surrounding the proper terminology and diagnostic criteria used when evaluating female sexual or genital pain. This review article attempts to clarify the terminologies used within the medical and scientific community, and provides an overview of current views on etiology and treatment. The likely biological antecedents to genital pain are an exaggerated and prolonged inflammatory response in the vestibular mucosa causing neuroproliferation, and leading to eventual hyperalgesia, allodynia, and pelvic muscle tension in the genital region. These processes interact with psychosocial factors to produce chronic pain. Treatment includes education, CBT, pelvic floor physiotherapy, medical interventions, and surgical interventions, though sexual function may be optimized through a multifaceted approach. RésuméLa GPPPD est une catégorie diagnostique relativement récente de la dysfonction sexuelle féminine, qui a été introduite dans le DSM-5 en 2013. La GPPPD reflète la combinaison de deux catégories précédentes de dysfonctionnement sexuel féminin, la dyspareunie et le vaginisme, en une entité. En tant que tel, il existe une confusion entourant la terminologie appropriée et les critères de diagnostique utilisés lors de l’évaluation de la douleur sexuelle ou génitale féminine. Cet article de revue tente de clarifier les terminologies utilisées dans la communauté médicale et scientifique et donne un aperçu des points de vue actuels sur l’étiologie et le traitement. Les antécédents biologiques probables à la douleur génitale sont une réponse inflammatoire exagérée et prolongée dans la muqueuse vestibulaire entraînant une neuroprolifération, et conduisant à une éventuelle hyperalgésie, allodynie et tension musculaire pelvienne dans la région génitale. Ces processus interagissent avec des facteurs psychosociaux pour produire une dou- leur chronique. Le traitement comprend l’éducation, la TCC, la physiothérapie du plancher pelvien, les interventions médicales et les interventions chirurgicales, bien que la fonction sexuelle puisse être optimisée par une approche multidimensionnelle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.293
Threshold uncertainty score0.317

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.132
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it