MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2777984631 · doi:10.11575/prism/27073

Nesting and Egg Incubation in Dinosaurs: Morphological and Statistical Investigations into the Study of Eggs, Eggshells, and Nests

2016· dissertation· en· W2777984631 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Kohei Tanaka

Bibliographic record

VenuePRISM (University of Calgary) · 2016
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Evolutionary Biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJapan Student Services OrganizationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDinosaur Research InstituteYoshida Scholarship FoundationCalifornia State Polytechnic University, Pomona
KeywordsEggshellNesting (process)IncubationNest (protein structural motif)Egg incubationBird eggZoologyBiologyEcologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Archosaurs (e.g., crocodylians, dinosaurs, and birds) are the most diverse and successful terrestrial vertebrates. An understanding of the nesting strategies in both extinct (e.g., non-avian dinosaurs) and extant archosaurs (i.e., crocodylians and birds) is crucial for advancement of our knowledge on the evolution and diversification of this group. However, nesting methods and behaviors of non-avian dinosaurs are still poorly understood due to the limitations of the fossil record. In this dissertation, certain features of eggs and nests in dinosaurs (e.g., clutch size, egg mass, substrates of nests, water vapor conductance of eggs, and eggshell porosity) are compared with those of their closest living relatives (i.e., birds and crocodylians) and aspects of dinosaur nesting (i.e., nest type, incubation behavior, incubation heat source, and incubation period) are inferred and reconstructed. Findings in this dissertation suggest that nests and nesting styles among non-avian dinosaurs were diverse, and that bird-like traits were acquired throughout their evolution. Analyses of eggs and eggshell porosity indicate that more basal dinosaurs (i.e., ornithischians, sauropodomorphs, Lourinhanosaurus) completely covered their eggs with nest materials during incubation, although more derived forms (e.g., oviraptorosaurs, troodontids) used open nests, like modern birds, in which the eggs were not fully buried. The lithologies of the clutches of basal dinosaurs reveal their nests were probably incubated with external heat sources (e.g., microbial respiration, solar radiation), like those of modern crocodylians and megapode birds. Distribution and lithologies of some ornithischian and some sauropodomorph clutches show that heat from microbial respiration, in particular, was used for incubation, whereas other sauropodomorphs may have used inorganic heat sources, such as solar radiation. More derived dinosaurs (i.e., maniraptorans) had eggshell porosities and clutch lithologies that indicate their nests were partially open, indicating that these taxa brooded their eggs. Regardless of the type of nest, heat source, or incubation behavior, incubation period of most non-avian dinosaurs examined was relatively short, more comparable to that of birds than crocodylians. Major dinosaur (and archosaur) clades show diversity in their nesting and incubation, and also reveal a transition to more bird-like nesting features through evolution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePRISM (University of Calgary)→Same topicPaleontology and Evolutionary Biology→French-language works237,207→