MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2778031277 · doi:10.1109/socc.2017.8226008

Hybrid multi-swarm optimization based NoC synthesis

2017· article· en· W2778031277 on OpenAlexafffund
Muhammad Obaidullah, Gul N. Khan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInterconnection Networks and Systems
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersNortheastern States Research CooperativeCMC Microsystems
KeywordsNetwork on a chipComputer scienceParticle swarm optimizationSwarm behaviourParallel computingTabu searchLatency (audio)InterconnectionPower consumptionPower (physics)Mathematical optimizationAlgorithmEmbedded systemMathematicsComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Network-on-Chip (NoC) has been proposed as an interconnection framework for connecting large number of cores for a System-on-Chip (SoC). Assuming a mesh-based NoC, we explore the assignment of cores to cross-points and produce a best NoC configuration with minimum average communication traffic, power consumption and chip area. We use pre-synthesized network components data to estimate power and chip area of the NoC. NoC configuration and mapping problem belongs to NP-hard complexity set, therefore we propose a hybrid scheme of swarm optimization that combines Tabu-search, force-directed swapping, sub-swarms, and Discrete Particle Swarm Optimization (DPSO). The main goal of the optimization is to configure the NoC such that the total NoC latency, power consumption, and area occupied are minimal. DPSO is used as the main optimization scheme and modified so that each particle move is also influenced by a force derived from the NoC traffic matrix. The methodology is tested for some multimedia application core graphs as well as large network of randomly generated cores. It is determined that on average our hybrid technique required less number of iterations and time to reach an optimal solution when compared with existing NoC synthesis algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.878
Threshold uncertainty score0.576

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInterconnection Networks and SystemsFrench-language works237,207