MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2778192929

Producing Trans Economicus: Deploying Market Logic in the Fight for Trans Rights

2017· article· en· W2778192929 on OpenAlexaffabout
Evan Vipond

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Review of Social Policy / Revue canadienne de politique sociale · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFoucault, Power, and Ethics
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeoliberalism (international relations)Political scienceHumanitiesMeritocracySociologyWelfare economicsLawEconomicsPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article analyzes how market logic is deployed to secure trans rights under neoliberalism in Canada and the U.S. I argue that by embodying the ‘ideal’ neoliberal subject, productive trans persons are granted access to state institutions and social services, including transition-related medical care. This is achieved through the accumulation of what Foucault (2008) calls “human capital” and appealing to market logic (cost-benefit analysis). While doing so may afford certain trans people – namely white, affluent, and able-bodied – increased access to services and material success, it ultimately reinforces neoliberal logic, further obscuring and exacerbating social and economic inequalities. I argue that trans persons who achieve material success are upheld as ‘proof’ that neoliberalism functions as a meritocracy, shifting the burden of social and economic responsibility away from the state and onto the individual. Resume Cet article fait l’analyse critique de la defense des droits des personnes transgenre au Canada et aux Etats-Unis sous des politiques neoliberales. Mon argument est que les personnes transgenres performantes ont acces aux institutions et aux services publics, y compris les soins medicaux lies a la transition, si elles incarnent « l’ideal » neoliberal. Cet ideal est atteint a travers l’accumulation de « capital humain » comme le definit Foucault (2008) et de l’interet selon la logique du marche (analyses couts-avantages). Bien que cette politique offre l’acces aux services et le succes materiel a certains transgenres — pour la plupart des blancs, riches et sans handicap — en fin de compte, la logique neoliberale est confortee, et les inegalites sociales et economiques obscurcies et exacerbees. Les personnes transgenres ayant reussi materiellement sont presentees comme etant la « preuve » que le neoliberalisme est un systeme qui offre l’egalite des chances. Le poids des responsabilites sociales et economiques est transfere a l’individu, privant de leurs droits les membres les plus marginalises de la communaute transgenre. Mots cles: Droits des transgenres ; politique sociale neoliberale ; logique du marche ; capital humain

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.920
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Review of Social Policy / Revue canadienne de politique socialeSame topicFoucault, Power, and EthicsFrench-language works237,207