MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2778552380 · doi:10.3399/bjgp17x694193

Viewpoint: Doctor daughter

2017· article· en· W2778552380 on OpenAlexaff
Lesley Morrison

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of General Practice · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealthcare Systems and Challenges
Canadian institutionsEngineers Without Borders Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDaughterMedicineData scienceWorld Wide WebComputer scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

My mother died when she was 94. She wanted to die and she died at home; it was a good death. My father, 4 years her ‘junior’, could not, and did not want to, believe that she was dying. They had been married for 66 years and she had always been there. When it was clear that Mum was failing, my sister and I tried to talk to Dad about what was happening and that he would soon lose his wife. He was a very intelligent, self-educated man, but emotional intelligence and ability to express emotions had never been his strong point. The son of a shell-shocked survivor of First World War trenches, he had rarely been shown overt affection as a child and, other than warm words in letters, verbal or physical expression of affection was not in his repertoire. Despite our repeated encouragement to spend quiet bedside time with …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.441
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.123
GPT teacher head0.505
Teacher spread0.382 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of General PracticeSame topicHealthcare Systems and ChallengesFrench-language works237,207