MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia: Development of a new clinical scale

2006· article· en· W2778607127 on OpenAlexaff
Hazim Kadhim, Khalifa Khalifa, Deltenre, Casimir, G Se ́bire

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicGenetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversité de SherbrookeHôpital Fleurimont
FundersFonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS
KeywordsRating scaleScale (ratio)AtaxiaPsychologyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationMedicinePsychiatryDevelopmental psychologyCartographyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: To investigate the cytokine-related molecular cascade leading to neural cell death in periventricular leukomalacia (PVL).Methods: The authors explored potential tumor necrosis factor ␣ (TNF␣) signaling pathways in human brains with PVL and conducted in situ immunohistochemical investigations to search for possible expression of cytokine receptors in these brains.They also investigated likely links to molecules potentially involved in neurocytotoxicity, particularly pathways involving nitrosative-induced apoptosis.Results: TNF␣ overexpression was associated with immune reactivity for p75TNF␣R2 and p55TNF␣R1 receptors in affected PVL areas.p75TNF␣R2 labeling was intense on cerebrovascular endothelial cells in PVL areas, whereas no vascular p55TNF␣R1 immunoreactivity was detected therein.Immune labeling for both receptors was detected on many white matter parenchymal cells.In contrast, there was no immune reactivity for either receptor in tissues taken from non-PVL areas.Additionally, in situ overexpression of inducible nitric oxide synthase was found in PVL brain regions where apoptotic cell death was detected.Conclusions: Both p75TNF␣R2 and p55TNF␣R1 receptors and nitric oxide may be implicated in the pathogenesis of periventricular leukomalacia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations141
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurologySame topicGenetic Neurodegenerative DiseasesFrench-language works237,207