MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia: Development of a new clinical scale

2006· article· en· W2778607127 on OpenAlexaff
Hazim Kadhim, Khalifa Khalifa, Deltenre, Casimir, G Se ́bire

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicGenetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversité de SherbrookeHôpital Fleurimont
FundersFonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS
KeywordsRating scaleScale (ratio)AtaxiaPsychologyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationMedicinePsychiatryDevelopmental psychologyCartographyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: To investigate the cytokine-related molecular cascade leading to neural cell death in periventricular leukomalacia (PVL). Methods: The authors explored potential tumor necrosis factor (TNF) signaling pathways in human brains with PVL and conducted in situ immunohistochemical investigations to search for possible expression of cytokine receptors in these brains. They also investigated likely links to molecules potentially involved in neurocytotoxicity, particularly pathways involving nitrosative-induced apoptosis. Results: TNF overexpression was associated with immune reactivity for p75TNFR2 and p55TNFR1 receptors in affected PVL areas. p75TNFR2 labeling was intense on cerebrovascular endothelial cells in PVL areas, whereas no vascular p55TNFR1 immunoreactivity was detected therein. Immune labeling for both receptors was detected on many white matter parenchymal cells. In contrast, there was no immune reactivity for either receptor in tissues taken from non-PVL areas. Additionally, in situ overexpression of inducible nitric oxide synthase was found in PVL brain regions where apoptotic cell death was detected. Conclusions: Both p75TNFR2 and p55TNFR1 receptors and nitric oxide may be implicated in the pathogenesis of periventricular leukomalacia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.261
Threshold uncertainty score0.257

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations141
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurologySame topicGenetic Neurodegenerative DiseasesFrench-language works237,207