MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2778711195 · doi:10.1177/1093526617705271

Submucosal Colonic Lipoblastoma Presenting With Colo-colonic Intussusception in an Infant

2017· article· en· W2778711195 on OpenAlexaff
Marie‐Anne Bründler, Kyle C. Kurek, Kamlesh Patel, Ingo Jester

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric and Developmental Pathology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSoft tissue tumor case studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLipoblastomaMedicineAdipose tissueIntussusception (medical disorder)PathologyTransverse colonSubmucosaPathologicalAbdomenLaparotomyMesenteryAnatomyRadiologyLipomaSurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lipoblastoma is a benign adipose tumor typically presenting in infancy in superficial soft tissues of extremities. Intestinal complications secondary to intraabdominal or retroperitoneal involvement are exceedingly rare. We describe a unique case of a primary intestinal lipoblastoma arising from the submucosa of the transverse colon in an otherwise healthy 18-month-old boy. He presented with a history of reducible rectal prolapse, rectal bleeding, and episodic abdominal pain and was initially treated for constipation. Imaging identified a short colo-colonic intussusception, confirmed at laparotomy, and a fatty mass thought to arise from the mesentery. Pathological examination of the resected transverse colon revealed a submucosal tumor composed of a mixture of mature adipose tissue, foci of myxoid mesenchymal tissue with desmin positive, HMGA2 negative spindle cells, and scattered lipoblasts, characteristic of lipoblastoma. Lipoblastoma should be considered as a potential albeit rare cause of intussusception in young children, where a pathologic lead point is infrequently identified.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric and Developmental PathologySame topicSoft tissue tumor case studiesFrench-language works237,207