Adsorption and Dissolution Behaviors of Carbon Dioxide and <i>n</i>-Dodecane Mixtures in Shale
Bibliographic record
Abstract
CO 2 cyclic injection is a promising method for enhanced shale oil recovery. However, the enhanced shale oil recovery mechanism is unclear, especially the adsorption and dissolution of CO 2 and oil in kerogen. Therefore, it is of great importance to study the adsorption and dissolution mechanisms of CO 2 and oil mixtures in shale. In this study, a new experimental apparatus was designed to test the change in the mole fractions of CO 2 and oil before and after adsorption and dissolution at equilibrium conditions. For simplicity, n -dodecane ( n -C 12 ) was used as the oil. The adsorption and dissolution amounts of CO 2 and n -C 12 were obtained using a mathematical method. Moreover, the adsorption and dissolution characteristics of the CO 2 and n -C 12 mixtures in shale and the effect of pressure on the adsorption and dissolution amounts were studied. Finally, the swelling factor of the shale, which was caused by the dissolution of the mixtures, was calculated from the experimental results. The results show that dissolved n -C 12 in shale could be replaced by CO 2 when the mole fraction of CO 2 in the free phase was larger than a threshold. The adsorption and dissolution amounts of CO 2 and n -C 12 increased with pressure. The lower pressure and larger mole fraction of CO 2 enabled a lower swelling factor of shale. This study provides a straightforward method to experimentally determine the adsorption and dissolution properties of shale, which can be used to evaluate enhanced shale oil recovery by CO 2 injection and the geological storage of CO 2 .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".