MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Site M0077: Open Hole

2017· book-chapter· en· W2778904678 on OpenAlexaff
S. P. S. Gulick, Joanna Morgan, Claire L. Mellett, S.L. Green, Timothy J. Bralower, Elise Chenot, Gail Christeson, Philippe Claeys, Charles S. Cockell, Marco J. L. Coolen, L. Ferrière, Catalina Gebhardt, K. Goto, H. Jones, D. A. Kring, Johanna Lofi, Christopher M. Lowery, R. Ocampo, Ligia Pérez‐Cruz, A. E. Pickersgill, M. H. Poelchau, A.D. Rae, Cornelia Rasmussen, M. Rebolledo‐Vieyra, Ulrich Riller, H. Sato, Jan Smit, Sonia M. Tikoo-Schantz, Naotaka Tomioka, J. Urrutia‐Fucugauchi, Michael T. Whalen, A. Wittmann, W. Zylberman

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the International Ocean Discovery Program. Expedition reports · 2017
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Canadian institutionsContinental (Canada)
FundersNational Science Foundation
KeywordsGeologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The upper part of Hole M0077A, the Open Hole interval, was drilled without coring to maximize the potential to reach the target drilling depth. A rotary drill was used for open-hole drilling from the seabed to 505.7 m drilling depth below seafloor (DSF). Attempts to recover drilling chips from this open-hole section were largely unsuccessful due to loss of drilling fluid into the formation. However, some lithologic and biostratigraphic data were recovered and will be used to support the geological interpretation of the wireline logging data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.102
Threshold uncertainty score0.342

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1020.017

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the International Ocean Discovery Program. Expedition reportsSame topicMethane Hydrates and Related PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207