MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2778965307 · doi:10.20431/2454-7980.0302005

The Stable Isotope Composition of the Calcite Cement in the Fluvio-Deltaic Reservoir Sandstones of the Lower Acacus Formation, Ghadames (Hamada) Basin, NW Libya

2017· article· en· W2778965307 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Omar Elfigih

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Petroleum and Petrochemical Engineering · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMemorial University of Newfoundland
KeywordsCalciteGeologyGeochemistryStructural basinCementStable isotope ratioComposition (language)GeomorphologyMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Lower Acacus Formation of Upper Silurian age in the Ghadames (Hamada) Basin, NW Libya,is an important sandstone reservoir.The formation is buried at a depth of 7500ft in the southern part of the basin and down to 8500ft in the northern part.The Lower Acacus Formation is characterized by regressive and transgressive cyclic sequences of sandstones, siltstone and shale, whose deposition and distribution were controlled by relative changes in the sea level.The Lower Acacus Formation deposited in a fluvio-deltaic system that prograded northward and into the northwestern flank of the intracratonic Ghadames (Hamada) Basin.A combination of optical microscopy and stable isotopic analyses were used in order to provide detailed constraints on the composition of calcite cements, the evolution of pore fluid types, and the relative timing of calcite cement precipitation.The principal cements occluding porosity include carbonates, quartz overgrowth, and some subordinated kaolinite and illite.Two types of calcite cements have been distinguished based on texture and manner of occurrence in thin-sections: 1) Patchy calcite cement which regarded as shallow calcite cement, occurs in the southerly shallower portions of the basin characterized the fluvial, iron oxide-rich sandstones (Af2-Af7 units).2) Poikilotopic calcite cement which regarded as deep calcite cement, occurs in the northerly deeper parts of the basin characterized the deltaic sandstones (A8-A14 units).Isotopic compositions of calcite cements in the Lower Acacus Formation reflect different regional paleo-fluid regimes from meteoric to mixed waters.Relatively shallow depth patchy calcite-cement is associated with sandstone units of fluvial origin.This cement formed from enriched δ 18 O meteoric waters at low temperature and the lighter negative δ 13 C nature of this calcite suggests an involvement of organically derived CO 2 .Deeper depth poikilotopic calcite-cement formed from waters depleted in δ 18 O that became progressively hotter, more reducing and saline as they flowed down-dip to mix with the saline waters in sandstone-siltstone units of deltaic origin, with negative δ 13 C values which probably record the increasing importance with depth of bicarbonate production by thermal decarboxylation.It is important to note that it is difficult to determine the timing (early or late) of the patchy shallow to homogeneously distributed poikilotopic deep calcite cements.However the data suggest that two possible deltaic systems prograded from NE to W and from S to NNW may be inferred, in which both the shallow and the deep calcite cements were formed synchronously.The shallow cement was precipitated in the fluvial sandstones from meteoric waters and the deep calcite cement was precipitated in the deltaic sandstones as the waters flowed down-basin becoming progressively more saline and reducing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.112

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Petroleum and Petrochemical Engineering→Same topicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils→French-language works237,207→