Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article fait état de la notion de prédicat au Québec. Depuis une vingtaine d’années, un cadre de grammaire moderne a été adopté par le ministère de l’Éducation dans les programmes de français. En considérant la description de la phrase, cet article retrace d’abord des moments clés de l’introduction de la grammaire nouvelle au primaire et au secondaire dans la succession des programmes officiels. Dans un deuxième temps, la terminologie relative aux constituants de la phrase est examinée dans un échantillon de matériel didactique et de grammaires, faisant ainsi apparaitre l’émergence graduelle de la notion de « prédicat ». Enfin, des exemples tirés d’une recherche en cours illustrent l’utilité des notions de la grammaire moderne, dont celle de prédicat, pour aider les élèves, entre autres, à mieux ponctuer les phrases qu’ils écrivent. La conclusion invite à considérer les conditions d’un changement de pratique en enseignement de la grammaire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".