Investigation of Physical Phenomena Underlying Temporal-Enhanced Ultrasound as a New Diagnostic Imaging Technique: Theory and Simulations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Temporal-enhanced ultrasound (TeUS) is a novel noninvasive imaging paradigm that captures information from a temporal sequence of backscattered US radio frequency data obtained from a fixed tissue location. This technology has been shown to be effective for classification of various in vivo and ex vivo tissue types including prostate cancer from benign tissue. Our previous studies have indicated two primary phenomena that influence TeUS: 1) changes in tissue temperature due to acoustic absorption and 2) micro vibrations of tissue due to physiological vibration. In this paper, first, a theoretical formulation for TeUS is presented. Next, a series of simulations are carried out to investigate micro vibration as a source of tissue characterizing information in TeUS. The simulations include finite element modeling of micro vibration in synthetic phantoms, followed by US image generation during TeUS imaging. The simulations are performed on two media, a sparse array of scatterers and a medium with pathology mimicking scatterers that match nuclei distribution extracted from a prostate digital pathology data set. Statistical analysis of the simulated TeUS data shows its ability to accurately classify tissue types. Our experiments suggest that TeUS can capture the microstructural differences, including scatterer density, in tissues as they react to micro vibrations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".