MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2779117378 · doi:10.22401/jnus.17.2.18

Application of CCME Water Quality Index to Assess the Suitability of Water for Protection of Aquatic Life in Al- Radwaniyah-2 Drainage in Baghdad Region

2017· article· en· W2779117378 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Adel M. Rabee, Hasanain Abbood Hassoon, Ahmed Jasim Mohammed

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Al-Nahrain University-Science · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Quality and Pollution Assessment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWater qualityDrainageEnvironmental scienceIndex (typography)Aquatic ecosystemWater resource managementHydrology (agriculture)Environmental chemistryEcologyEngineeringBiologyChemistryGeotechnical engineeringComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Canadian Council of Ministries of the Environment (CCME) Water quality index used in this study for rating water quality in Al-Radwaniyah-2 drainage indicates that the quality of water in all studied stations is poor.The studied water parameters in it usually deviate from normal levels and the water is not capable to protect or support ample aquatic life.The Results showed that the TDS, Total hardness, Turbidity, Magnesium, Total coliform and Fecal coliform are the main factors responsible for deterioration of the drainage water quality.These parameters need to different procedures to maintain the quality of water in order to protect aquatic life or for any other uses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.129
Threshold uncertainty score0.257

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Al-Nahrain University-ScienceSame topicWater Quality and Pollution AssessmentFrench-language works237,207