MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2779295571 · doi:10.1109/tap.2017.2787658

Vector Parabolic Equation-Based Derivation of Rectangular Waveguide Surrogate Models of Arched Tunnels

2017· article· en· W2779295571 on OpenAlexafffund
Xingqi Zhang, Costas D. Sarris

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Wave Propagation Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsWaveguideMathematical analysisPhysicsOpticsGeometryMathematicsAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Radio-wave propagation in tunnels and mines can be qualitatively understood by representing these environments as overmoded waveguides. Waveguide models are fast and intuitive, but the accurate prediction of the propagation characteristics of realistic geometries is beyond their scope. Such predictions can be derived by computationally intensive techniques, such as ray-tracing and vector parabolic equation (VPE) methods. This paper combines the two approaches, to extract surrogate models of arched tunnels in the form of rectangular waveguides. The parameters of the latter are optimized to match their propagation characteristics to those of the original arched tunnel, as predicted by the VPE method. The accuracy and limitations of these surrogate models are thoroughly evaluated. Their practical usefulness is demonstrated in an application where they are iteratively used, in lieu of the original computationally costly arched tunnel model, to optimally distribute the access points of an in-tunnel wireless communication system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and PropagationSame topicRadio Wave Propagation StudiesFrench-language works237,207