MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2779437101 · doi:10.1109/spawc.2017.8227777

On the performance analysis of mixed multi-aperture FSO/multiuser RF relay systems with interference

2017· article· en· W2779437101 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNakagami distributionFadingErgodic theoryComputer scienceRelayInterference (communication)Co-channel interferenceRadio frequencyTopology (electrical circuits)MathematicsElectronic engineeringChannel (broadcasting)TelecommunicationsPhysicsEngineeringMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we consider multi-aperture multiuser dual-hop amplify-and-forward (AF) free-space optical/radio frequency (FSO/RF) communication systems where the FSO and RF links, respectively, experience Málaga M-distribution and Nakagami-m fading. Moreover, the effect of co-channel interference is considered at users. Under the assumption of transmit aperture selection at the source and opportunistic scheduling at the destination, we derive the exact expression for the ergodic capacity in terms of bivariate Meijer's-G function. Additionally, resorting to extreme value theory, we derive closed-form expressions for the asymptotic ergodic capacity, all in terms of Meijer's G and elementary functions, whenever the number of apertures at the source and/or users grows large.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.173
Threshold uncertainty score0.254

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it