Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les soirees et les nuits des Lavallois du XVIII e siecle sont souvent troublees par des bandes de « coureurs de nuit ». L'examen des archives de justice permet de preciser leur identite, les types de jeux et de violences qu'ils affectionnent et qui peuvent souvent etre interpretees comme un defi a l'ordre social. La specificite de cette delinquance tiendrait donc non seulement a la nature des actions commises mais aussi aux intentions des acteurs et au regard que portent sur eux les adultes en general et les magistrats en particulier; elle temoigne de la place de la jeunesse dans la societe. The evenings and the nights to inhabitants of Laval during the xvnte century are often disturbed by parties of « coureurs de nuit ». The examination of the records of justice permit to specify their identity, the types of their plays and the violence they like ; they can often be interpreted like a challenge with the social order. The specificity of this delinquency can be connect with the nature of their actions and also with the intentions of the actors and with the way adults and magistrates look at them ; it shows the place of youth in the society.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.026 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.015 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.008 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.035 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".