The temporal courses of word frequency effect and syllable frequency effect of Chinese handwritten production in the old: An ERP study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
摘要： 本研究运用事件相关电位技术, 考察了老年人(60岁以上)汉语词汇书写产生过程中的词汇频率效应和音节频率效应的时间进程。实验中采用图画命名范式, 要求被试在看到图画之后迅速且准确地写出相应的名称。结果表明：词汇频率和音节频率影响汉字书写的潜伏期, 表现为高词汇频率词的书写潜伏期短于低词汇频率词, 高音节频率词的书写潜伏期短于低音节频率词; 在书写产生的早期阶段, 词频与音节频率效应独立发生, 早期词频效应可能来源于正字法词典中信息的提取, 早期音节频率效应可能来源于语音词典中对音节的提取, 且词频效应早于音节频率效应, 这为“正字法自主假设”提供了支持证据。在书写产生的晚期阶段, 词频和音节频率之间存在交互作用, 这可能是由于语音词典和正字法词典之间的双向联结, 激活的双向扩散引起的。语音信息在书写产生过程被激活, 在较晚的阶段影响了正字法编码过程。
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".