MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2779785116 · doi:10.21071/ced.v7i.10896

Franquin, Spirou, Lagaffe, Le Trombone illustré, Idées noires : de quelques exemples de folie en bande dessinée

2017· article· es· W2779785116 on OpenAlexaff
Chris Reyns-Chikuma

Bibliographic record

VenueÇédille · 2017
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLatin American Literature Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En este artículo, estudiamos la evolución del concepto de locura como medio de crítica social en la obra de Franquin. Desde las aventuras del héroe Spirou y de su compañero estrafalario, Fantasio, publicadas por un editor católico entre los años 30 y 50 del siglo XX en una revista para la familia, pasando por Gaston, el antihéroe burlesco que, a su manera, protesta contra el sistema de producción hipercontrolador y rígido de la editorial Dupuis en los años 60-70, dicha crítica desemboca en los gags “anarquistas” del Trombone illustré muy pronto rechazados por el editor y los gags de las Idées noires de los años 70 que expresan a la vez la locura mortífera de los seres humanos y la depresión del autor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0090.010
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÇédilleSame topicLatin American Literature AnalysisFrench-language works237,207