MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2779923543 · doi:10.1109/rtuwo.2017.8228538

A waste city management system for smart cities applications

2017· article· en· W2779923543 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCaching and Content Delivery
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGarbageGeolocationTruckBinWaste collectionComputer scienceSmart cityInternet of ThingsTransport engineeringReal-time computingDatabaseWaste managementEngineeringMunicipal solid wasteComputer securityWorld Wide WebAutomotive engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a new method of smart waste city management which makes the environment of the city clean with a low cost. In this approach, the sensor model detects, measures, and transmits waste volume data over the Internet. The collected data including trash bin's geolocation and the serial number is processed by using regression, classification and graph theory. Thenceforth a new method is proposed to dynamically and efficiently manage the waste collection by predicting waste status, classifying trash bin location, and monitoring the amount of waste. Then, this latter recommends the optimization of the route to manage the garbage truck efficiently. Finally, the simulation results are presented and estimated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.972
Threshold uncertainty score0.424

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations53
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCaching and Content DeliveryFrench-language works237,207