Acreditação internacional em hospital brasileiro: perspectivas da equipe multiprofissional
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RESUMOObjetivo: apreender as percepções de profissionais acerca das implicações da Acreditação Internacional. Método: estudo qualitativo, descritivo e exploratório, realizado com 23 trabalhadores da equipe multiprofissional de um hospital privado brasileiro, certificado pela Acreditação Internacional, modelo Accreditation Canada International, que responderam a uma entrevista semiestruturada gravada. Os dados foram analisados pela técnica de Análise de Conteúdo Temática. Resultados: das falas, apreenderam-se três categorias: A Acreditação proporciona satisfação e reconhecimento profissional; Acreditação: Incentivo à prática da Educação Permanente em Saúde e A Acreditação Internacional promove melhorias no processo de trabalho. Conclusão: os trabalhadores perceberam a Acreditação Internacional como recurso que (re)direcionou as práticas de gestão da qualidade, promoveu melhorias no capital humano e incrementou a cultura de segurança. Descritores: Acreditação Hospitalar; Gestão da Qualidade; Organização Internacional; Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente.ABSTRACT Objective: to understand the perceptions of professionals about the implications of International Accreditation. Method: a qualitative, descriptive and exploratory study carried out with 23 workers from the multiprofessional team of a Brazilian private hospital, certified by Accreditation International, Accreditation Canada International, who answered a semi-structured, recorded interview. The data were analyzed using the Thematic Content Analysis technique. Results: from the speeches, three categories were apprehended: Accreditation provides professional satisfaction and recognition; Accreditation: Incentive to the practice of the Permanent Education in Health and; International Accreditation promotes improvements in the work process. Conclusion: workers perceived International Accreditation as a resource that (re) directed to quality management practices, promoted improvements in human capital and increased safety culture. Descriptors: Hospital Accreditation; Quality Management; International Organization; Patient Care Team.RESUMEN Objetivo: aprehender las percepciones de profesionales acerca de las implicaciones de la Acreditación Internacional. Método: estudio cualitativo, descriptivo y exploratorio, realizado con 23 trabajadores del equipo multiprofesional de un hospital privado brasileño, certificado por la Acreditación Internacional, modelo Accreditation Canada International, que respondieron a una entrevista semiestructurada, grabada. Los datos fueron analizados por la técnica del Análisis de Contenido Temático. Resultados: de las hablas, se aprehendieron tres categorías: La Acreditación proporciona satisfacción y reconocimiento profesional; Acreditación: Incentivo a la práctica de la Educación Permanente en Salud; La Acreditación Internacional promueve mejoras en el proceso de trabajo. Conclusión: los trabajadores percibieron la Acreditación internacional como recurso que (re) dirigió a las prácticas de gestión de la calidad, promovió mejoras en el capital humano e incrementó la cultura de seguridad. Descriptores: Acreditación de Hospitales; Gestión de la Calidad; Organización Internacional; Grupo de Atención al Paciente.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".