Miejsce rzeczywiste – miejsce wyobrażone: nieistniejąca dzielnica żydowska w Lublinie we wspomnieniach mieszkańców
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Jews constituted one of the most important ethnic and religious groups in the history of Lublin. Under the Nazi occupation the Lublin Jewish quarter was turned into a ghetto. In March 1942, after the liquidation of the ghetto, the area was knocked down. And so, extermination of Jews was accompanied by destruction of the local architectural structures and urban layout which had been developed over a few centuries.
 The article discusses contemporary narratives relating to the no longer existing Jewish quarter. The processes of remembering and forgetting, as well as recurring constructing of this kind of narratives will be analyzed in relation to the oral history interviews taken by the author in the years 1998–2005 as part of the documentary programme “Oral History of Lublin” run by the “Brama Grodzka – Teatr NN” Centre. The analyses are a starting point for searching the answer to questions about historical, social and cultural determinants of creating (reconstructing) the narrative about the Jewish quarter – as a place in a topographical sense and a symbolic space of cultural otherness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it