MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2780149346 · doi:10.3917/nras.076.0045

Les effets d’une intervention en conscience morphologique sur l’orthographe lexicale chez des élèves arabophones

2016· article· fr· W2780149346 on OpenAlex
Anila Fejzo, Lucie Godard, Line Laplante

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLa nouvelle revue - Éducation et société inclusives · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicReading and Literacy Development
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cette étude vise à mesurer les effets d’une intervention en conscience morphologique sur l’orthographe lexicale chez des élèves arabophones issus de milieux défavorisés. Cinquante- deux élèves arabophones du 2e cycle du primaire scolarisés en français ont participé à cette étude. Les élèves du groupe expérimental ont suivi le programme d’intervention pendant dix semaines. Afin d’en vérifier les effets, des mesures de conscience morphologique et d’orthographe lexicale ont été administrées au pré-test et au post test. Des variables telles que la conscience phonologique, l’identification de mots isolés et l’intelligence non verbale ont également été mesurées dans le but de mieux comparer les groupes de recherche. Les effets significativement positifs de l’intervention qui ont été observés suggèrent que l’enseignement explicite de la conscience morphologique soutient les scripteurs intermédiaires arabophones scolarisés en français issus de milieux défavorisés.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.687
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it