Les effets d’une intervention en conscience morphologique sur l’orthographe lexicale chez des élèves arabophones
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette étude vise à mesurer les effets d’une intervention en conscience morphologique sur l’orthographe lexicale chez des élèves arabophones issus de milieux défavorisés. Cinquante- deux élèves arabophones du 2e cycle du primaire scolarisés en français ont participé à cette étude. Les élèves du groupe expérimental ont suivi le programme d’intervention pendant dix semaines. Afin d’en vérifier les effets, des mesures de conscience morphologique et d’orthographe lexicale ont été administrées au pré-test et au post test. Des variables telles que la conscience phonologique, l’identification de mots isolés et l’intelligence non verbale ont également été mesurées dans le but de mieux comparer les groupes de recherche. Les effets significativement positifs de l’intervention qui ont été observés suggèrent que l’enseignement explicite de la conscience morphologique soutient les scripteurs intermédiaires arabophones scolarisés en français issus de milieux défavorisés.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".