MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2780155308

Effects of physical activity and exercise on physical and mental health outcomes in female older adults with arthritis

2017· dissertation· en· W2780155308 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Barbara Piasecka

Bibliographic record

Venuee-scholar@UOIT (University of Ontario Institute of Technology) · 2017
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPhysical Activity and Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMental healthGerontologyPhysical therapyPhysical healthPhysical activityMedicinePsychologyPhysical exerciseArthritisClinical psychologyPsychiatryInternal medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Arthritis is a chronic, degenerative disease, which affects two million older Canadians, of which the majority are older females (65+ years). With no cure, methods to improve arthritic symptoms are essential to maintain physical and mental health. Physical activity (PA) and exercise may be advantageous strategies for improving arthritis-related symptoms and mental health outcomes, yet there is a lack of consistent evidence surrounding these terms. Aims and Significance: The aim of this cross-sectional study was to evaluate the health-related benefits of PA and exercise and assess the relationship between leisure-time activity levels and pain; discomfort; physical function; range of motion (ROM); mobility, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes in females aged 65 years and older. Methods: 40 older females residing in the Durham Region of Ontario participated in the study of which 60% (N=24) were categorized as active (71 years mean age) and 40% (N=16) were considered inactive (82 years mean age). Self-reported questionnaires were employed to measure health outcomes including a visual analog scale (VAS), a health questionnaire, medical outcomes short form-12 (SF-12) and activity levels questionnaire for older adults (ALQOA). Results: Older active arthritic females reported less pain (p<0.001); less discomfort (p<0.001); higher physical function (p<0.0001); higher ROM (p<0.001); higher mobility (p<0.0001), and higher HRQOL (p<0.0001) scores, in comparison to their inactive counterparts. Conclusion: In support of my hypotheses, older females with arthritis who were active reported significantly: (i) Less pain; (ii) lower discomfort; (iii) higher HRQOL; (iv) higher mobility; (v) higher physical function, and (vi) higher ROM. These preliminary findings suggest that older females with arthritis living an active lifestyles can have both physical and mental health benefits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.085

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuee-scholar@UOIT (University of Ontario Institute of Technology)Same topicPhysical Activity and HealthFrench-language works237,207